Jump to content
Double Fine Action Forums

Right Said Brett

DFA Backers
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

1 Follower

About Right Said Brett

  • Rank
    Cheeky Lamington
  • Birthday 08/28/1982


  • PSN Tag
  • Location
    Outside your window, staring in with weird eyes
  • Occupation
    Brain Surgeon/Rocket Scientist/Chief Supervisor of fries at McDonalds
  • Biography
    Born in the mountains of Ladakh, India and raised by wolves, Davies is a crazed man-child who didn't have contact with another human being for almost 30 years.During the Winter of 1982, when Davies was just 2 months old, he was rescued by a pack of wolves after his family were slaughtered by a swarm of disgruntled bees. It wasn't until the ripe age of 28 that Davies finally ventured away from his Indian heritage and his canis lupus guardians to seek other hominids like himself, eventually boar

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'd talk about my own leakage problems, in an effort to encourage a bit of lively discussion but that's not going to lead to anything other than buckets of disgust and one rather ashamed man sitting within a puddle of his own shame.
  2. I don't have much to add in regards to the demise of Telltale, other than to echo what others have already said; I'm sad for the employees and the raw deal that they received (some of the personal stories coming forward are truly egregious) but in all honesty, I'm kind of glad to see the studio itself go. I feel that Jim Sterling's two videos on the subject cover my feelings towards the whole fiasco well enough. I hope that the ex-employees get their much deserved compensation and soon find new jobs at other studios, ones which actually respect and value their talent. The sales chart for the past few years of Telltale games pretty much says it all really... ...I was quite surprised to see such a sharp decline in sales between seasons 1 and 2 of The Walking Dead (less than half the total number of players for the second season). I guess that more people were nonplussed by the first season (as was I) than I had initially thought. It makes one wonder why they so rigidly stuck to the same old, tired formula for the past couple of years. I guess that they felt that grabbing hot intellectual properties would be enough to recreate the hit of The Walking Dead: Season 1. The phrase 'resting on one's laurels' springs to mind (as does 'what goes around, comes around', for that matter). The old mutt's been put out to pasture. It was kinder this way. Once the rabies kicked in and innocent people within her vicinity were being crushed betwixt her frothing and mighty maw, it was time to euthanise the dog. I choose to remember the good times; before the madness; before the screams; before the tears of sorrow; before the blood and carnage. Let's all look back and recall that first moment when we all laid eyes upon that lovable little puppy, so full of life and limitless potential, with a Bone laying at the tips of her paws.
  3. That's exactly what a person who's not alive would say. *narrows eyes at Ghost Johro*
  4. No, I'm generally curious if that was what was been implied. There's no hostility behind my question, just a desire for clarification.
  5. Yes. That's daft. There's a few cases of that kind of nonsense with successful Hollywood movies. I trust that you aren't implying that Solo is such a case though?
  6. There will always be a degree of variance, to an extent but in the case of Solo; it hasn't broken even. Not even close. The production budget is listed as $275 (Hollywood accounting; it's probably closer to $350, given the reshoots). That does not include the marketing budget. It's a bomb, plain and simple.
  7. I'm sorry but no they don't. You're wrong. Budgets are usually listed as the production budget. It would be highly unusual for them not to be. For a change, I know of what I speak.
  8. You're wrong. I don't think that you know how box-office accounting works. The general wisdom is that a movie on the scale of Solo needs to make approximately 2.5 times it's budget, just to breakeven. This is because studios generally spend around the same amount as a movie's budget on marketing and also only receive a percentage of the box-office (cinemas take their cut and the studio also receives a lower percentage from foreign box-office takings). Solo has an estimated budget of $275 million (and that's conservative, given the extensive reshoots) and would therefore need to make at least $550 just to breakeven. Solo's total box-office, thus far? $370. It's a bomb and a financial disaster, whichever way you cut it. I know. I was was being purposefully obtuse because I'm a git.
  9. I'm not that much of a loser neckbeard, you know? Also, as an extremely casual Star Wars fan (the kind who doesn't even own any of the movies on DVD), I really don't have that much vested interest in the series. I am fascinated by Hollywood politics though. I never said that Kennedy will be ousted. I'm simply saying that there will have been discussions regarding the possibility. To what extend those discussions have elevated to, that is up for debate. However, the fact that there will have undoubtedly been discussions of some kind, is really not up for debate. Solo is the biggest box office bomb of the year, thus far (and is likely to remain so). The biggest box office bomb of the year also happens to be an installment in one of the biggest sure-fire money making franchises of all time. The higher ups at Disney will have certain things to discuss regarding that and in particular, how they wish to handle the person whom spearheaded, greenlit and produced said bomb (Kennedy). How is that not a fact, going by the logic of rudimentary cause and effect? You surely can't be implying that it's all sunshine and roses over at the House of Mouse and that Kennedy's position is 100% secure and no discussions have taken place between her bosses, behind closed doors? I stick by what I said and in the context of which I said it. It's a FACT. I might not have any proof to back that fact up but I don't need it because I am infallible. Actually, no, wait... now I remember; inflammable is what I am. Please disregard everything that I just said. There's a naked flame nearby and it's making me extremely nervous and that is a fact.
  10. It's completely irrelevant whether she's lying or not. FACT: Serious discussions regarding Kathleen Kennedy's position and future at Lucasfilm are happening and have been happening for some time now, behind closed doors. SOURCE: Basic logic. Greenlighting and releasing a highly divisive movie, to the point of fracturing the fanbase, in a series that's all about appealing to people from all walks of life; leading to the next movie in said series becoming the biggest box office bomb of the year, is liable to put your appointed job in serious jeopardy, to say the least. In Hollywood, you're only ever as successful as your last movie.
  11. I'll honestly be very surprised if Rian Johnson's trilogy actually goes ahead. The Last Jedi and its divisive reaction (to be put it kindly) is undoubtedly partly to blame for Solo bombing.
  12. I hadn't heard that myself but it wouldn't surprise me. I reckon that set must have been absolutely miserable to be on, what with all of the behind the scenes turmoil. Naturally, Disney's PR machine tried to put a positive spin on the change of directors and what have you but if you read between the lines (and know how Hollywood operates), that production was toxic.
  • Create New...